Not necessarily. The government charges and professional scope differ by route and circumstances, and beneficiary-specific evidence is still required. A company blanket does not make the individual transfer or family processing free.
Compare the complete routes
Ask counsel to identify applicable petition or consular charges, fraud-prevention or other applicable fees, professional preparation and dependent steps using current schedules. Form I-129 and Form I-129S have different fee treatment, so a generic fee quote can mislead. Include appointment and travel costs where relevant.
Choose a viable route based on the case, then compare its actual total rather than only one filing line. Scope is where quoted figures mislead. A price for the principal’s filing usually excludes the family’s steps, the corporate evidence gathering, translations, courier and appointment costs, and any second effort if the first submission draws a request for evidence.
It also excludes the operational work of proving the qualifying relationship when the group’s records sit in several jurisdictions. Hypothetical example: a tool and die maker with a Canadian parent and two European subsidiaries finds that assembling ownership evidence for the covered chain absorbs more professional time than the transfer paperwork itself. Ask for the exclusions in writing, since the only reliable comparison between blanket and individual processing is a total that names what each figure leaves out.