No. Urgency does not replace qualifying citizenship, a listed profession, the required credentials, prearranged professional employment, or a temporary purpose. First establish whether the missing item merely proves an existing fact or whether the underlying qualification is not yet satisfied.
Distinguish delay from ineligibility
For example, a hypothetical applicant who earned a credential but awaits an official record presents a different question from someone who has not completed a required degree. Ask the reviewer what evidence can establish the actual facts and whether waiting is necessary. An employer can clarify duties and adjust dates, but should not change the description to imply qualifications or responsibilities that do not exist.
There is a threshold worth naming here: the point at which the question stops being administrative and becomes a matter for advice. Hypothetical example: a college teacher holds a completed degree and awaits the official transcript, which is a records problem with a known solution. A second applicant has completed most of a required programme but not all of it, which is not a records problem at all and cannot be solved by waiting for post.
The first can proceed on a schedule; the second needs a different conversation entirely. Ask the reviewer to say which situation applies before any date is set. An employer may clarify duties and adjust dates, and must never adjust a description to imply qualifications or responsibilities that do not exist.