It can add document collection, translation and ownership-review work, but it does not create a special investment threshold. The qualifying capital and enterprise cost still need their own substantive assessment.
Budget evidence work explicitly
Identify records required from each entity and avoid counting intercompany transfers repeatedly as fresh investment. Keep corporate transaction expenses, commercial funding and immigration application charges distinguishable. Verify current government fees for the actual applicants and process.
More corporate layers do not prove a stronger case; the budget should reflect the work needed to explain the real structure rather than assumed complexity-based eligibility. Ask the first review to identify the evidence work by entity, because that is what drives cost in a layered structure. Each additional layer adds record collection, sometimes translation, and analysis of who ultimately owns and controls it.
Have those items listed with an estimate against each, so a decision can be made about which are essential. The structure adds evidence work and does not create a special investment threshold, and the qualifying capital and enterprise cost still require their own substantive assessment. Ask specifically how intercompany transfers will be treated, since money moving between entities in the same group can appear several times in a funding narrative and should be counted once.
Keep corporate transaction expenses and commercial funding separate from immigration preparation and current government charges.