No. Account access is a way to manage case activity, not a decision on permanent-residence eligibility or admissibility.
Keep administrative and legal milestones distinct
Ask counsel to explain the significance of an actual notice rather than relying on the existence of a dashboard. The official process may request supporting information and further review. A visible account or uploaded document should not be described to an employer or family as approval unless the relevant government decision establishes it.
Write the two tracks side by side. The administrative track covers account creation, uploads, receipts and message history. The legal track covers eligibility, admissibility and whatever decision the programme, as currently described, ultimately produces.
Movement on the first tells you the file is being handled. It says nothing about whether the second has been decided. Hypothetical example: an owner of a warehouse robotics business tells a lender that a completed upload means the matter is settled.
It does not, and a commercial commitment made on that basis is exposed. Give each track an owner. An assistant can maintain the administrative record; only counsel should interpret a notice, and only the applicant should approve what is submitted.
The current individual framework requires the applicant to pay a nonrefundable DHS processing fee and, after vetting, make an unrestricted gift to the United States that is deposited in the Treasury; successful applicants proceed through EB-1 or EB-2 subject to eligibility, admissibility and visa availability, and published terms may change. Obtain the current written procedure and the official FAQ, and ask counsel what a particular notice actually establishes.