Review it before finalizing the investment and filing narrative, while the proposed governance can be understood alongside the financial commitment. Control should not be left to an informal promise to grant authority after approval.
Verify the final version
Compare the executed documents with the structure originally assessed, including any investor protections negotiated by other parties. If rights change during fundraising, revisit both control and enterprise nationality. This preparation stage is separate from government processing.
A planned closing or relocation date should not conceal the need to resolve who will actually direct the enterprise. Compare the executed documents against the versions on which advice was given, and treat that comparison as a required step rather than a formality. Investor protections, reserved matters and removal rights are commonly added late in a negotiation, and they are precisely the terms determining control.
Ask the adviser to confirm the analysis against the final signed set, noting the date and version reviewed. Where a further funding round is anticipated, ask what changes would require reassessment and record the answer, so the trigger is known in advance rather than identified afterwards. Review governance while the financial commitment is still being settled, since the two are negotiated together and separating them tends to leave control as the item conceded.
An informal promise to grant authority after approval is not a term and should not be relied on.