Explain who owns or controls the funds and which family member’s proposed payments they would support. Do not use household wealth as a substitute for that explanation.
Keep people and payments connected
The programme describes additional charges for included relatives. A family funding table can distinguish those obligations from the principal’s amount, while counsel reviews any questions arising from joint ownership or transfers. Do not assume that a shared account automatically resolves each participant’s documentation requirements.
Where funds are shared or held jointly, describe the reality rather than adopting whichever characterization is most convenient. Establish who contributed what and over what period, how the assets are held as a matter of law, and how the family regards them, noting where those three answers diverge. Then keep the financial description consistent with the family documentation, since the two are read together and an inconsistency in dates, names or relationships is more damaging than either would be alone.
Where one person's funds are to be used by another, identify the legal character of that arrangement and document it as what it is. And keep the question of whose money it is separate from the question of who intends to relocate, since the answers need not be the same and merging them creates confusion in both directions.